Borges and I have never agreed with each other. Same with Kafka. The puzzling thing is that I've loved other authors who either influenced them or were influenced by them (such as
Macedonio Fernández,
Georges Perec, and
Ferenc Karinthy), and I came into Kafka and Borges wholly
expecting to love them. I studied both in college too, but that still didn't help. (Actually, the best insight into Kafka I've ever gotten was from an anthology about the Iron Curtain called
The Wall in My Head.) So when I heard that our
Non-Structured Book Club was going to be doing an extracurricular Borges reading, I initially opted out and chose to simply read everyone's posts instead. But then I found myself intrigued by what was being said about "Pierre Menard, Author of the
Quixote," so I decided, why not? Maybe I should give Mr. Borges another chance.
"Menard" is written in the form of an article from an academic journal. The author/narrator was a friend of the late Pierre Menard, a French literary critic, and is utterly infatuated with what he perceives to be Menard's brilliant project involving Miguel de Cervantes's
Don Quixote. Menard wanted to write it himself. Not copy it. He wanted to somehow channel Cervantes and compose the
Quixote word for word. As Menard explained it:
When I was ten or twelve years old, I read it, perhaps in its entirety. Later, I have reread it closely certain chapters, those which I shall not attempt for the time being. I have also gone through all the interludes, the plays, the Galatea, the exemplary novels, the undoubtedly laborious tribulations of Persiles and Segismunda and the Viaje del Parnaso . . . My general recollection of the Quixote, simplified by forgetfulness and indifference, can well equal the imprecise and prior image of a book not yet written. Once that image (which no one can legitimately deny me) is postulated, it is certain that my problem is a good bit more difficult that Cervantes' was. My obliging predecessor did not refuse the collaboration of change: he composed his immortal work somewhat à la diable, carried along by the inertias of language and invention. I have taken on the mysterious duty of reconstructing literally his spontaneous work.
Menard rejects the idea of literally
becoming Cervantes by forgetting all the history of Europe since 1602, fighting the Turks as Cervantes did, and so forth on the grounds that such a thing would be impossible. Of course, he acknowledges that the whole undertaking is impossible, but of all the ways of going about it, that would be the least interesting.
Borges's imaginary academic nevertheless believes that Menard's endeavor was quite successful, even perceiving his friend's signature style in certain passages of the
Quixote which are completely identical to those of Cervantes. He claims to recognize the influence of Shakespeare and further praises Menard's mastery of a foreign language and alien dialect (Renaissance Spanish) compared to Cervantes's advantage of writing in his own native tongue. Why, it's astounding, he goes on, that Menard was able to ignore the work of William James and, like Cervantes, proclaim history to be the
origin of reality instead of an
inquiry into reality! In short, the narrator is arguing that Menard's word-for-word duplicate of the
Quixote is richer, deeper, and a grander achievement than Cervantes's original.
As Emily notes in
her post, Borges brings up a multitude of questions surrounding context, subjectivity, and perspective. Although the two texts are identical, the copy is held to be superior because its reader (the author of the article) was able to locate more meaning in it. In other words, he examined the copy as an artifact of the environment in which it was produced: the early twentieth century, presumably in France, as opposed to Spain in the late 1500s. Since the narrator views this
Quixote as having arisen entirely in the mind of Menard, it's like a
copy without an original.
It was then that the heavens opened, a light shined down, and Borges started to make sense.
I'm a big fan of
Ghost in the Shell, a (
post)cyberpunk Japanese franchise that began with the
Ghost in the Shell manga by Masamune Shirow and has since expanded to include two manga sequels, three acclaimed anime films, and a popular anime television series. Like
The Matrix, which it greatly influenced,
GitS is deeply concerned with postmodern philosophy and social theory. The title of the TV show,
Ghost in the Shell: Stand Alone Complex, refers to a concept developed over the first season. The "
stand alone complex" is basically a "phenomenon where unrelated, yet very similar actions of individuals create a seemingly concerted effort." For example, say a building catches fire and burns down. While accidents like that happen all the time, depending on the greater context of the time and place in which said building was located, people can get it into their heads that the fire was the work of an arsonist motivated by whatever political or religious ideology is currently making news (i.e. Islamic terrorism). Several malcontents then get on the imaginary bandwagon and commit their own acts of arson in the name of Allah. A chain of spontaneous order is then created out of the chaos of society, politics, media, and random accidents. But the copycats have no original.
And then I realized I was doing the exact same thing as Borges's fictional academic! I was anachronistically analyzing an older text ("Pierre Menard: Author of the
Quixote" by Jorge Luis Borges) from the perspective of someone familiar with literary and philosophical ideas that would not be developed until decades after said text was written. "To attribute the
Imitatio Christi to Louis Ferdinand Céline or to James Joyce, is this not a sufficient renovation of its tenuous spiritual indications?" Menard's disciple asks. (I like Emily's translation better: ". . . a sufficient renewal of those faded spiritual warnings?") Just as Cervantes's position regarding the power of letters v. arms could not possibly have been influenced by Nietzsche (as Menard's completely identical passage is claimed to have been), Borges could not possibly have written "Pierre Menard" with any knowledge of Japanese cyberpunk anime.
And thus: the meaning of a text is ultimately subjective, as the reader's response always occurs within the context of the reader's knowledge and experience, which may be completely and utterly different, especially given the passage of time, from those of the author.
I get it!
I like Borges now!My Borges edition, incidentally, has an introduction by William Gibson, whose
Neuromancer trilogy is widely regarded as the origin of the cyberpunk genre. I
knew I was onto something.
It's the audio from the Matrix: Reloaded
trailer with images from GitS: SAC
, starring Togusa as Neo, Motoko Kusanagi as Trinity, and Daisuke Aramaki as Morpheus.
The
Non-Structured Book Club is reading three short pieces by Borges for the month of May. Our schedule is as follows:
May 7: "Pierre Menard, Author of the
Quixote"
May 14: "The Library of Babel"
May 21: "The South"
This week's participants were:
ClaireEmilyNicoleRichardRiseSarah
I've got a new post up at Slaves of Golconda. It's a group blog/book club I participate in that "meets" every two months to discuss the selection we had voted on from a list of candidates. This time it was Lorna Sage's award-winning autobiography Bad Blood. Unfortunately, I didn't finish it. It started to bore me and I was already weighed down by Tender Morsels, which was also dragging. So I decided to cut my losses and post about the parts of Bad Blood I did read.
Posts
