data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8a68e/8a68e64cf1d6a8e06fa252ea1cde6a9f71fc7b93" alt=""
But! I'm not sure my header looks quite right anymore! What do you think? Be honest!
(Note: This is a three-column background. Even though I have two-column blog, I prefer to use these for a cleaner, less cluttered look.)
Update: New header added after my last comment! Like? Dislike? Actually, I find myself wondering if it would look better with the two-column version of this design.
Update #2: Here is a screenshot of the two-column option, which looks too crowded to me. How about you?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/28ab4/28ab4453560370836e3a94bddad7a007b46c6957" alt=""
9 comments:
Your header looks bigger than I remember. Not necessarily shabbier, though. And if you don't include a photo of handsome young author beefcake on top, Frances might criticize your lack of "eye candy." Just so you know!
I agree with Richard - your header looks somehow bigger. Did the new background (which I quite like, by the way) change the resolution on the rest of your blog, or something?
I like the way the inside column moves and the outsides stay put. It sort of has a psychedelic feel to it. I like it! And I'm glad you kept the koi box. Definitely a plus, and the fish match the sides. But is that cyrillic I detect on the sides? Tsk, tsk. Good thing you aren't living in Arizona. Heaven only knows what they could make of that!
Richard & Emily: No, the blog resolution hasn't changed. The header is the same size; I guess this background gives it the illusion of being bigger.
Jill: Yes, I love my fish. So lifelike! I actually don't see any writing, though, but that's probably because my laptop screen has the tendency to cut off blog backgrounds.
So, everyone: Does my header look right with this new background? I'm worried the styles don't match, with the header being Art Nouveau and the background being contemporary grungy/shabby chic.
Your last comment just said what I was going to say (except without the actual correct terminology). Your header (which I've always liked) looks too fancy for the background (which I like, too, btw). I think it needs a few less swirls.
Hmmm . . . So how 'bout the new one? I'm going for a stylistic contrast between the grungy, distressed background and the clean, bold, classical-looking lines of my new header. Or did I miss the mark?
I like the look very much. I do like the header with the new background. The black in the header echoes the black in the background. And I really love black text on a white background. I find that the easier combination to read.
I really love black text on a white background. I find that the easier combination to read.
Yes, so do I! With all due respect to Richard, I've read that a lot of people find light text/dark background annoying to read (although it doesn't bother me). And it's always bugged me when the middle part (where your posts go) has a design instead of a solid color. It's too busy and can interfere with the words, I think.
Black text on white is much easier to read. I really like the new look!
Post a Comment